Performance of two accessions of Urochloa humidicola managed under rotational grazing in the Antioquian Northeast (Colombia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(12)162-172Abstract
Livestock activity in the neotropics is carried mainly on soils characterized as acidic and of low fertility, and Urochloa humidicola is a perennial tropical grass option for use in such conditions. The objective of this study was to compare the forage and animal performance of the accessions U. humidicola CIAT-16886 versus CIAT-679 managed under rotational grazing systems in the northeastern region of Antioquia, Colombia. Between August 2016 and October 2017, at El Nus Research Center (Agrosavia), in a 5 ha area for each accession, biomass availability, plant height (PH) and cover (CO), the contents of crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), the in situ dry matter digestibility (ISDMD), the forage allocation (FA), and the cumulative (CLWG) and by cycle (LWGpC) live weight gain were measured, using cattle of the local Blanco Orejinegro (BON) breed. Generalized linear mixed models were used for data analysis. Significant differences (P<0.05) between both grass accessions were detected for forage biomass availability, PH, CO, CP and FA; whereas no differences between accessions were detected for NDF and ISDMD. A significant interaction between Accessions × Sex (P=0.033) was observed for CLWG, with females showing a higher LWG when grazing the CIAT-679 accession, while no significant differences between accessions were detected with males. Accession CIAT-679 showed a better performance for several agronomic variables and cattle live weight gain; hence, it could still be recommended for rational grazing systems under similar conditions to the ones of this study.
References
Ariza-Nieto C; Mayorga OL; Mojica B; Parra D; Afanador-Tellez G. 2018. Use of LOCAL algorithm with near
infrared spectroscopy in forage resources for grazing systems in Colombia. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 26(1):44–52. doi: 10.1177/0967033517746900
Avella L. 2018. Análisis de la composición nutricional de Brachiaria humidicola y Brachiaria Toledo en el Pie de Monte Llanero. Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia. ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/zootecnia/343/
Balehegn M; Berhe K. 2016. Training reduced subjectivity of comparative yield method of estimation of grassland biomass. Grass and Forage Science 71(3):482–489. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12194
Bastidas M; Ospina L; Rao IM; Montoya A; Villegas DM; Sotelo M; Bravo AM; Urrea-Benítez JL; Jaramillo G; Cardoso JA; Paez JD; Jaramillo D; Aguiar A; Arango J. 2023. Sistemas innovadores de siembra de Urochloa humidicola mediante estolones–un caso exitoso en la altillanura colombiana. Manual Técnico, Volumen 1. Publicación CIAT No. 545. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. 24 p. hdl.handle.net/10568/126708
Blanco M; Ripoll G; Delavaud C; Casasús I. 2020. Performance, carcass and meat quality of young bulls, steers and heifers slaughtered at a common body weight. Livestock Science 240:104156. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104156
Borgues JA; Barrios M; Sandoval E; Millán K; Sánchez D; Bastardo Y; Márquez O. 2012. Aspectos agronómicos y productivos de Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) en el estado Yaracuy. Mundo Pecuario 8(2):132–138. handle/123456789/35473
Brooks M; Bolker B; Kristensen K; Maechler M; Magnusson A; McGillycuddy M; Skaug H; Nielsen A; Berg C; van Bentham K; Sadat N; Lüdecke D; Lenth R; O’Brien J; Geyer CJ; Jagan M; Wiernik B; Stouffer DB. 2024. glmmTMB: Generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. R package (Version 1.1.9). doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.glmmTMB
Bureš D; Bartoň L. 2012. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different ages. Czech Journal of Animal Science 57(1):34–43. doi: 10.17221/5482-CJAS
Canchila ER; Soca M; Wencomo HB; Ojeda F; Mateus H; Romero E; Argüello G; Ruiz R; Canchila N. 2011. Comportamiento agronómico de siete accesiones de Brachiaria humidicola durante la fase de establecimiento. Pastos y Forrajes 34(2):155–166. bit.ly/3B527hq
Cruz-Hernández A; Hernández-Garay A; Chay-Canul AJ; Mendoza-Pedroza SI; Ramírez-Vera S; Rojas-García AR; Ventura-Ríos J. 2017. Componentes del rendimiento y valor nutritivo de Brachiaria humidicola cv Chetumal a diferentes estrategias de pastoreo. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 8(3):599–610. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v8i3.34
Cruz-López PI; Hernández-Garay A; Enríquez-Quiroz JF; Mendoza-Pedroza SI; Quero-Carrillo AR; Joaquín-Torres BM. 2011. Desempeño agronómico de genotipos de Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweickt en el trópico húmedo de México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 34(2):123–131. doi: 10.35196/rfm.2011.2.123
Giraldo LA; Tejido ML; Ranilla MJ; Ramos S; Carro MD. 2008. Influence of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet. Journal of Animal Science 86(7):1617–1623. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0343
Gomes FK; Oliveira MDBL; Homem BGC; Boddey RM; Bernardes TF; Gionbelli MP; Lara MAS; Casagrande DR. 2018. Effects of grazing management in brachiaria grass-forage peanut pastures on canopy structure and forage intake. Journal of Animal Science 96(9):3837–3849. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky236
Gonzáles R; Anzúluez A; Vera A; Riera L. 1997. Manual de pastos tropicales para la Amazonia ecuatoriana. Manual No 33. Instituto Nacional Autónomo de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Quito, Ecuador. 66 p. handle/41000/2432
Guevara D. 2022. Análisis de estabilidad fenotípica paramétrica de híbridos apomícticos de Brachiaria (Brachiaria humidicola) en múltiples ambientes. Tesis Magister Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. handle/unal/83197
Hartig F; Lohse L. 2022. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. R package (Version 0.4.6). doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.DHARMa
Hernández A; Cruzate CI. 2020. Evaluar el rendimiento de la Brachiaria humidicola en sistema rotacional comparándola con pastos colosoana (Botriocloa pertusa), Tanzania (Megathyrsus maximus), Pasto Guinea Mombaza (Panicum máximum, Jacq) en un sistema de pastoreo tradicional. Proyecto de investigación. Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Córdoba, Colombia. handle/10596/38914
Hill JO; Coates DB; Whitbread AM; Clem RL; Robertson MJ; Pengelly BC. 2009. Seasonal changes in pasture quality and diet selection and their relationship with liveweight gain of steers grazing tropical grass and grass-legume pastures in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 49(11):983–993. doi: 10.1071/EA06331
Jarma-Orozco A; Maza-Angulo L; Pineda-Pérez A; Hernández-Ciodaro J. 2014. Aspectos fisiológicos y bromatológicos de Brachiaria humidicola. CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia 7(1):87–98. bit.ly/3zoSklx
Keller-Grein G; Maass BL; Hanson J. 1996. Natural variation in Brachiaria and existing germplasm collections. En: Miles JW; Maass BL; do Valle CB; Kumble V, eds. Brachiaria: Biology, agronomy, and improvement. CIAT Publication no. 259. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT); Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Gado de Corte (CNPGC). Cali, Colombia. p. 16–42. hdl.handle.net/10568/54362
Laiton-Medina JF; Hurtado-Nery VL; Granados-Moreno JE. 2021. Evaluación de tres especies de Brachiaria spp con pastoreo rotacional para ceba bovina. Orinoquia 25(1):15–22. doi: 10.22579/20112629.652
Lee MA. 2018. A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments. Journal of Plant Research 131(4):641–654. doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y
Lenth RV; Bolker B; Buerkner P; Giné-Vázquez L; Herve M; Jung M; Love J; Miguez F; Piaskowski J; Riebl H; Singmann H. 2024. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package (Version 1.10.2). doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.emmeans
Londoño-Gil M; Rincón-Flórez JC; Saldarriaga-Saldarriaga A; López-Herrera A; González-Herrera LG. 2023. Características de crecimiento del ganado criollo Blanco Orejinegro y efectos ambientales responsables de su variación. Acta Agronómica 71(2):171–177. doi: 10.15446/acag.v71n2.99435
Mannetje L't; Haydock KP. 1963. The dry-weight rank method for the botanical analysis of pasture. Grass and Forage Science 18(4):268–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00362.x
Montenegro R; Pinzón B; Argel P. 1995. Evaluación de Brachiaria humidícola (CIAT 6369) bajo pastoreo en condiciones de Gualaca, Panamá. Ciencia Agropecuaria 8:137–148. bit.ly/3B2wHIt
Pérez BR; Lascano CE. 1992. Pasto Humidicola (Brachiaria Humudicola) Rendle Schweickt. Boletín técnico no. 181. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA), Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. 20 p. hdl.handle.net/10568/69586
Puzio N; Purwin C; Nogalski Z; Białobrzewski I; Tomczyk Ł; Michalski JP. 2019. The effects of age and gender (bull vs steer) on the feeding behavior of young beef cattle fed grass silage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 32(8):1211–218. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0698
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/
Reyes-Purata A; Bolaños-Aguilar ED; Hernández-Sánchez D; Aranda EM; Izquierdo-Reyes F. 2009. Producción de materia seca y concentración de proteína en 21 genotipos del pasto humidícola (Brachiaria humidicola, Rendle). Universidad y Ciencia, Trópico Húmedo 25(3):213–224. doi: bit.ly/3MFL1t1
Rincón A. 2011. Efecto de alturas de corte sobre la producción de forraje de Brachiaria sp. en el piedemonte Llanero de Colombia. Revista Corpoica-Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 12(2):107–112. doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol12_num2_art:219
Rincón A; Flórez H; Ballesteros H; León LM. 2018. Efectos de la fertilización en la productividad de una pastura de Brachiaria humidicola cv. Llanero en el Piedemonte de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 6(3):158–168. doi: 10.17138/TGFT(6)158-168
Savian JV; Neto AB; de David DB; Bremm C; Schons RMT; Genro TCM; Amaral GA do; Gere J; McManus CM; Bayer C; Carvalho PCF. 2014. Grazing intensity and stocking methods on animal production and methane emission by grazing sheep: Implications for integrated crop-livestock system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.008
Torres N; Moctezuma M; Rojas AR; Maldonado MA; Gómez A; Sánchez P. 2020. Comportamiento productivo y calidad de pastos híbridos de Urochloa y estrella pastoreados con bovinos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 11(Especial 24):35–46. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v0i24.2356
Valencia-Echavarría DM; Granja-Salcedo YT; Nieto-Sierra DF; Martínez-Oquendo PY; Restrepo-Castañeda GJ; Cano-Gallego LE; Mayorga-Mogollón OL. 2022. Effect of botanical composition calibration on the accuracy of undisturbed sward height and comparative yield method techniques for herbage mass estimation in tropical heterogeneous pastures. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 41(2):142–146. doi: 10.2989/10220119.2022.2125578
Vargas-Rodríguez CF. 2008. Comparación de ganancias de peso en bovinos Reyna-Jersey y Jersey, durante la etapa de desarrollo. Agronomía Mesoamericana 19(2):227–232. doi: 10.15517/am.v19i2.5004
Velásquez AV; Silva GG da; Sousa DO; Oliveira CA; Martins CMMR; Santos PPM dos; Balieiro JCC; Rennó FP; Fukushima RS. 2018. Evaluating internal and external markers versus fecal sampling procedure interactions when estimating intake in dairy cows consuming a corn silage-based diet. Journal of Dairy Science 101(7):5890-5901. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13283
Vergara-López J; Araujo-Febres O. 2006. Producción, composición química y degradabilidad ruminal in situ de Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick en el bosque seco tropical. Revista Científica de La Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia 16(3):239–248. bit.ly/4elpfqg
Villegas DM; Arévalo A; Sotelo M; Nuñez J; Moreta D; Rao I; Ishitani M; Subbarao GV; Arango J. 2022. Phenotyping of Urochloa humidicola grass hybrids for agronomic and environmental performance in the Piedmont region of the Orinoquian savannas of Colombia. Grass and Forage Science 78(1):119–128. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12582
Waldo DR. 1986. Effect of forage quality on intake and forage-concentrate interactions. Journal of Dairy Science 69(2):617–631. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80446-5
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.