Evaluation of ten perennial forage grasses for biomass and nutritional quality

Authors

  • Mulisa Faji Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2606-1763
  • Gezahagn Kebede Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-769X
  • Fekede Feyissa Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Kedir Mohammed Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia.
  • Muluneh Minta Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia
  • Solomon Mengistu Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia.
  • Aschelew Tsegahun Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(9)292-299

Abstract

A study was carried out to evaluate 10 perennial forage grass accessions from 4 species for herbage dry matter yield and nutritional quality at Holetta Agricultural Research Center. The evaluated grasses species and varieties were one Desho grass (Pennisetum) variety Kulumsa, four Urochloa decumbens (ILRI-14721, ILRI-14720, ILRI-13205 and ILRI-10871), three Urochloa ruziziensis (ILRI-14813, ILRI-14774 and ILRI-13332) and two Setaria sphacelata (ILRI-143 and ILRI-6543) accessions. Plant height and forage dry matter yield were significantly affected by accession over years, during the establishment and production phases. Combined analysis indicated that the tested accessions varied significantly for plant height with the Setaria accessions taller than the other tested species. Combined data analysis revealed that forage dry matter yield significantly varied according to species and Desho grass (variety Kulumsa) was higher in dry matter yield than the other grasses tested. Fiber contents (NDF, ADF and ADL) were significantly influenced by accession. Crude protein yield differed among the accessions and Desho grass had higher crude protein, followed by U. decumbens (accession ILRI-13205), U. decumbens (accession ILRI-14721) and S. sphacelata (accession ILRI-6543). Based on dry matter yield and crude protein U. decumbens (accession ILRI-13205), U. ruziziensis (accession ILRI-13332), S. sphacelata (accession 6543) and Desho grass (var. Kulumsa) are recommended as alternative forage grasses for the study area and similar agro-ecologies. 

Author Biographies

Mulisa Faji, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia.

Researcher in Animal Feed and Nutrition Research Division

Gezahagn Kebede, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia.

Senior Researcher in Forage Agronomy

Muluneh Minta, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31 Holetta, Ethiopia

Senior Researcher in Forage Agronomy

How to Cite

Faji, M., Kebede, G., Feyissa, F., Mohammed, K., Minta, M., Mengistu, S., & Tsegahun, A. (2021). Evaluation of ten perennial forage grasses for biomass and nutritional quality. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 9(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(9)292-299

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

Issue

Section

Research Papers